Google
 

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

who reads my sms

In “Smart Mobs” a book by Howard Rheingold, I read about how the Filipinos managed to form a protest of ten thousands of people on one street by sending this small text message “Go 2EDA, Wear blck” which means go to Estada st and wear black. This message was sent between million of manila’s residents. They bring down the government by using networks and the technology.


Now, I really wonder if text messaging is that powerful and could really make different, do government or telephone companies filter these messages to prevent future act or to notify to authorities about protests or actions planned by some group by using this technology. Do some dictators in the world put some control in such messages? Do we really message freely or there are some consequences of sending some messages.

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

goOoal

I just love Upoc idea. I think it is great and excellent service. As I read in “SMART MOBS” the service helped a lot of people during the 9-11 attack by sending fast messages to subscribers.
In my country, soccer is very big thing. Last year. The soccer clubs their provided similar service. You subscribe to your team channel by sending a text message to a phone number and you pay them with your cell phone’s bill. They send to you the club news and live result and whatever the managements is planning to do. This service becomes very popular that almost every one who like soccer subscribe in one or more channels. The idea is to get the latest news and also to support your favorite club since the club will get a portion of the money.
I think this services would grow really fast since most people do not have that much time to watch TV or to read the news paper.

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Hate to answer the phone

I know a lot of people just ignore the annoying phone rings until they hear a familiar voice in the voice machine then they run to pick the phone up. All this is because the ton of advertising calls that they receive every day. The main point is that the advertising agents and businesses will still make such calls even if most of the people wont respond to them or even if they got bothered by these calls. As Shel Israel mentioned in “Naked Conversations” that these companies do not care if 98% of the people hate their call. They just care about the 2% who respond to them.
I totally agree with Israel. This kind of advertising annoying and does not work very well. One thing jumped into my mind while I was reading in the book about this point. The book mentioned that people pay money by trying to prevent such calls. This means that other parties are also benefits from such call. People buy expensive phones that recognize these calls. People also subscribe to show ID service from the telephone company mostly to avoid answering these calls. Also the fact that these companies are paying a lot of money to the telephone company so they can make the call. Also there are some companies that sell telephone numbers to advertising agencies.
Unfortunately too many parties are benefits from these calls so that I think there would be no reason for these company to stop these calls.

Tuesday, February 6, 2007

Free software = Slow development

First, I really like the idea of LINUX that everyone can participate in developing the OS as mentioned in the reading. The only thing that I think really slowed the development of LINUX is because it is free. Although I like to have free things, I think the developments of software would not be as developed as today if it was free service. Actually, we can see that first we have a software that Microsoft for example wrote and made available to buy, then after that people write another software that does the something that the Microsoft’s one does.
I wish that the anyone improve LINUX get some benefits or something in return for his time and effort by selling the OS for small portion of money.
I would like to connect my thoughts with what Marc A. Smith said in Smart Mobs book about collective action dilemma page 32. He gave an example that not every one watches public television sends a check. I wish it goes this way in free software or open sources style that not everyone pays for the service but at least someone is helping by donating or advertising for their services in these programs. Still I think providing the service for small portion of money would really help the development of such projects.